<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr feminism.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://literarylens.org/2009/01/flickr-feminism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://literarylens.org/2009/01/flickr-feminism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:20:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon H.</title>
		<link>http://literarylens.org/2009/01/flickr-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://looking-in.net/?p=170#comment-802</guid>
		<description>Taking a self-portrait is one of the most difficult things to do. I remember doing one for my photography class, and it just made me cry. Props to you for so boldly willing to make  yourself vulnerable to the world.

I disagree with the comment about narcissism, as one can assert that photography itself is narcissistic. In fact, all art forms can be asserted as such.

Is my view of the world correct? Art shows us different perspectives, but there is always that tenderness an artist feels when one considers their perspective. Narcissism is an attempt to get others to consider you. An artists worse fear is their work fading into obscurity.

Feminism, on the other hand, is no longer applicable to many of its traditional forms. Feminism, especially in literature, is not only focusing on the rights of females, but of many other minorities. It promotes the acceptance and validation of all people.

I think this comment was lewd and made in bad taste. Even if a viewer is not a fan of your work, it is always disgraceful to de-validate the expression.

I am quite a fan of this work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking a self-portrait is one of the most difficult things to do. I remember doing one for my photography class, and it just made me cry. Props to you for so boldly willing to make  yourself vulnerable to the world.</p>
<p>I disagree with the comment about narcissism, as one can assert that photography itself is narcissistic. In fact, all art forms can be asserted as such.</p>
<p>Is my view of the world correct? Art shows us different perspectives, but there is always that tenderness an artist feels when one considers their perspective. Narcissism is an attempt to get others to consider you. An artists worse fear is their work fading into obscurity.</p>
<p>Feminism, on the other hand, is no longer applicable to many of its traditional forms. Feminism, especially in literature, is not only focusing on the rights of females, but of many other minorities. It promotes the acceptance and validation of all people.</p>
<p>I think this comment was lewd and made in bad taste. Even if a viewer is not a fan of your work, it is always disgraceful to de-validate the expression.</p>
<p>I am quite a fan of this work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria G.</title>
		<link>http://literarylens.org/2009/01/flickr-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://looking-in.net/?p=170#comment-801</guid>
		<description>I always thought the definition of narcissism is the excessive love of self. From what I see from your photos, you are exploring yourself (not that way.. *raises one eyebrow*) through self-portraiture, which doesn&#039;t really coincide with the definition of narcissism that I am aware of.

But what also got my goat was that he had a very poor understanding of feminism. I find that unfortunate.
Like a previous commenter said, it&#039;s normal for art to be picked apart by a viewer. All creative types have to undergo that type of scrutiny, even from the ones who don&#039;t seem to understand anything at all.

Seems like you started a feminist &quot;awakening&quot; of your own in Flickr account by expressing these sentiments both in text and photos. From one feminist to another, I say good job. =D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought the definition of narcissism is the excessive love of self. From what I see from your photos, you are exploring yourself (not that way.. *raises one eyebrow*) through self-portraiture, which doesn&#8217;t really coincide with the definition of narcissism that I am aware of.</p>
<p>But what also got my goat was that he had a very poor understanding of feminism. I find that unfortunate.<br />
Like a previous commenter said, it&#8217;s normal for art to be picked apart by a viewer. All creative types have to undergo that type of scrutiny, even from the ones who don&#8217;t seem to understand anything at all.</p>
<p>Seems like you started a feminist &#8220;awakening&#8221; of your own in Flickr account by expressing these sentiments both in text and photos. From one feminist to another, I say good job. =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://literarylens.org/2009/01/flickr-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://looking-in.net/?p=170#comment-804</guid>
		<description>As I told you, the guy seems like a douchebag.&quot;Feminism is meant to protect the interest of women&quot; or whatever? Isn&#039;t that what your photos are representing? I think they look beautiful and vote for more self-portraits. Self-expression is different than simply being narcissistic, but if that were the case, since when is it a bad thing for artists to be narcissistic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I told you, the guy seems like a douchebag.&#8221;Feminism is meant to protect the interest of women&#8221; or whatever? Isn&#8217;t that what your photos are representing? I think they look beautiful and vote for more self-portraits. Self-expression is different than simply being narcissistic, but if that were the case, since when is it a bad thing for artists to be narcissistic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caity</title>
		<link>http://literarylens.org/2009/01/flickr-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>Caity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://looking-in.net/?p=170#comment-803</guid>
		<description>First of all, I think this particular self portrait is absolutely beautiful. Not only are you gorgeous, but your lighting, angles, and expression are also beautiful. It&#039;s a classy and artistic photo, too.

That being said, there are always going to be people who need to feel elitist and pick apart other people&#039;s work. It&#039;s rather unfortunate but it&#039;s just the way it goes. I find that the better something is, the more people need to find something wrong with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I think this particular self portrait is absolutely beautiful. Not only are you gorgeous, but your lighting, angles, and expression are also beautiful. It&#8217;s a classy and artistic photo, too.</p>
<p>That being said, there are always going to be people who need to feel elitist and pick apart other people&#8217;s work. It&#8217;s rather unfortunate but it&#8217;s just the way it goes. I find that the better something is, the more people need to find something wrong with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maddie</title>
		<link>http://literarylens.org/2009/01/flickr-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Maddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://looking-in.net/?p=170#comment-800</guid>
		<description>I love how he said something along the lines of &quot;exposing your naked body&quot;. Sure, you&#039;re naked, but you can&#039;t even see anything to be classified as &quot;nude&quot;?

I think he&#039;s just embarrassed, because he fails to get any females nude anyways. You broke his &quot;seeing a woman nude&quot; virginity. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how he said something along the lines of &#8220;exposing your naked body&#8221;. Sure, you&#8217;re naked, but you can&#8217;t even see anything to be classified as &#8220;nude&#8221;?</p>
<p>I think he&#8217;s just embarrassed, because he fails to get any females nude anyways. You broke his &#8220;seeing a woman nude&#8221; virginity. <img src='http://literarylens.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebee</title>
		<link>http://literarylens.org/2009/01/flickr-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://looking-in.net/?p=170#comment-799</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand what the point of his comment was. To make you feel bad? But yeah, there&#039;s definitely a double standard when it comes to women. If you&#039;re a man and you&#039;re interested in sexuality, you&#039;re awesome, you&#039;re a pimp, you get high fives from your &quot;bros.&quot; If you&#039;re a woman and you&#039;re interested in sexuality, you&#039;re a slut. It&#039;s stupid.

As a random side note, in the town I live in, Austin, Texas, it&#039;s perfectly legal for a woman to walk around without a shirt. It&#039;s kind of silly, but still pretty awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand what the point of his comment was. To make you feel bad? But yeah, there&#8217;s definitely a double standard when it comes to women. If you&#8217;re a man and you&#8217;re interested in sexuality, you&#8217;re awesome, you&#8217;re a pimp, you get high fives from your &#8220;bros.&#8221; If you&#8217;re a woman and you&#8217;re interested in sexuality, you&#8217;re a slut. It&#8217;s stupid.</p>
<p>As a random side note, in the town I live in, Austin, Texas, it&#8217;s perfectly legal for a woman to walk around without a shirt. It&#8217;s kind of silly, but still pretty awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
