<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intimate photography.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://literarylens.org/2009/04/intimate-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://literarylens.org/2009/04/intimate-photography/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:20:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://literarylens.org/2009/04/intimate-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://looking-in.net/photo/?p=106#comment-854</guid>
		<description>Two great photographs, especially the top one - what&#039;s so fascinating about this is that it suggests that your interest in mirrors spills out into compositions more generally - even if there&#039;s no *actual* mirror here - the identical flowery dresses, the two women holding children, the two gesticulating men - there&#039;s got to be more to be said about family habits of repetition and difference here!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two great photographs, especially the top one &#8211; what&#8217;s so fascinating about this is that it suggests that your interest in mirrors spills out into compositions more generally &#8211; even if there&#8217;s no *actual* mirror here &#8211; the identical flowery dresses, the two women holding children, the two gesticulating men &#8211; there&#8217;s got to be more to be said about family habits of repetition and difference here!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
