<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The beauty of the mundane.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://literarylens.org/2009/04/the-beauty-of-the-mundane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://literarylens.org/2009/04/the-beauty-of-the-mundane/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:08:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://literarylens.org/2009/04/the-beauty-of-the-mundane/comment-page-1/#comment-855</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://looking-in.net/photo/?p=112#comment-855</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t anything about the Device in the window - the thing that isn&#039;t a teapot ... that&#039;s something that makes the picture extra interesting - the inclusion of a mysterious, but obviously functional object.   Are &quot;worthwhile or beautiful&quot; the alternatives you make them out to be?   I wrote down Cindy Sherman&#039;s lines in my journal earlier this semester as a warning to myself: &quot;It seems boring to me to pursue the typical idea of beauty, because that is the easiest and most obvious way to see the world.   It&#039;s more challenging to look at the other side.&quot;   Which, of course, you&#039;ve done - but that also means that I&#039;m not sure that &quot;beautiful&quot; may therefore be the best word.

Your mother suffers for your art...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t anything about the Device in the window &#8211; the thing that isn&#8217;t a teapot &#8230; that&#8217;s something that makes the picture extra interesting &#8211; the inclusion of a mysterious, but obviously functional object.   Are &#8220;worthwhile or beautiful&#8221; the alternatives you make them out to be?   I wrote down Cindy Sherman&#8217;s lines in my journal earlier this semester as a warning to myself: &#8220;It seems boring to me to pursue the typical idea of beauty, because that is the easiest and most obvious way to see the world.   It&#8217;s more challenging to look at the other side.&#8221;   Which, of course, you&#8217;ve done &#8211; but that also means that I&#8217;m not sure that &#8220;beautiful&#8221; may therefore be the best word.</p>
<p>Your mother suffers for your art&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

